FDA Goes Graphic on New Cigarette Labeling

Last November the FDA announced an intention to up the ante when it comes to labeling for the packages of cigarettes and put on display for our consideration several versions of labels that offered quite graphic warnings on the dangers of smoking.

Today,  the Health and Human Services and the FDA unveiled the final designs with an aim to requiring their mandatory use by September 2012.

According to the release, the FDA selected nine images from the originally proposed 36 after reviewing the relevant scientific literature, analyzing the results from an 18,000 person study and considering more than 1,700 comments from a variety of groups, including the tobacco industry, retailers, health professionals, public health and other advocacy groups, academics, state and local public health agencies, medical organizations and individual consumers.

The messages on the labeling offer a contrast between scare tactics to discourage new smokers and make current smokers think twice, and messages that are supportive of those who might be considering quitting smoking.

The labels are certainly clear and they are graphic – but then so is the impact of smoking on the health of the public.

For many years now, cigarette packaging has included a warning about the dangerous effects of cigarette smoking, and those dangers are pretty universally known.  Here the agency is betting that making the warning more starkly apparent, and also providing some support for the positive choice of quitting, more people will kick the habit or not pick it up. Each package will have an 800 number for people to call if they are interested in quitting, though the release did not detail what kind of support people will get when they call the number.

For those who have ever traveled to other countries, one many have seen other more graphic warnings on the packages of cigarettes.  The study that the FDA conducted interviewed people about the effect the packaging might have.  What is not known is what impact it actually will have.  The psychology of smoking is probably complex.  Whether or not graphic images and an 800 number will be a major deterrent remains to be seen. Nevertheless, the beauty of the program is that even if one person quits, or one person does not take up smoking as a result of the labels, then it is a success.

The FDA will be tweeting messages about the new packaging today and is including some hashtags should you want to follow on Twitter – they are #cigwarnings#smokefree.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to FDA Goes Graphic on New Cigarette Labeling

  1. Jesse_EngAmer says:

    For the FDA to require further labeling restrictions is obvious over-reach, an infringement upon constitutionally protected commercial speech. With labels like “may be hazardous to your health” and “may result in death” that have been in effect for years not as small fine print, but large bold proclamations, you can’t get any clearer than that.
    It is already illegal for people under the age of 18 to purchase and smoke cigarettes so it’s redundant to tout this as increasing their protection, this goes above and beyond what is necessary or within the FDA’s scope of power. Consumers have every right to be well informed and to know the potential side effects of a product, but the days when cigarettes were thought to be beneficial to your health are long since past. In fact, it would be safe to assume that nearly, if not every cigarette smoker is well aware of the risks. The FDA has done their job to make us informed citizens but the now FDA has engaged in unmistakable overreach.

  2. anonymous says:

    wonder if the FDA vetted the visuals for truth in advertising and full information. I am no smoker, but they should eat their own dog food and find room on that ad for counter information to their claims that are also available as part of the data they collected to make their statements. What are the instances that it didn’t cause cancer, harm a baby,etc? Why do they not have to back up their bold , powerful headlines and visuals with fair balance copy.