FDA Presentation on Responses to 483s

CGEE J0385758   J0385753 What?  What is a 483?

A 483 is the vernacular for an FDA inspection of quality standards, manufacturing or the conduct of a clinical trial, and the discovery of deficiencies therein.  In other words, theygo through your manufacturing facility, for example, and then write up a list of the deficiencies and submit it to the company.  A company does not have to respond to the FDA in writing.  But, according to a presentation made by FDA in January, there are good reasons to do so.

Anything that is named by a number of a form – in this case Form 483 – sounds really bureaucratic and uninteresting.  Well, this is the exception to that rule.  A Form 483, if serious enough or left improperly attended can lead to a Warning Letter, or even worse in some circumstances – to a Consent Decree.  Large pharmaceutical companies, manufacturers and even non-profits have faced the prospect of Consent Decrees.  That is why a 483 is a big deal, not only from a substantive point of view – but from a communications point of view as well. 

In January 2009, the FDA presented "Writing an Effective 483 Response" at a conference held in Las Vegas.  It has some excellent advice, which bears echoing.  The presentation gave four reasons for submitting a response:

(i) A response could mitigate further FDA regulatory actions; (ii) A response demonstrates to the FDA and other stakeholders that the company understands the issues; (iii) A response demonstrates a commitment and intent to comply; and (iv) A response helps to establish credibility with FDA.  I would add a fifth and that is that the company is forced to analyze and agree on language that will characterize the situation – i.e., messaging. 

The presentation goes on to provide insight into elements that should be considered in developing a response:

  1. Include a statement and commitment from senior leadership;
  2. Address each observation separately;
  3. Note whether you agree or disagree with each observation;
  4. Provide a corrective outline that is specific, comprehensive, addresses the issues and is one that can be realistically delivered;
  5. Provide a timeframe;
  6. Commit to transparency and confirmation by credible parties;
  7. Submit appropriate documentation
  8. Be timely.

That is not only a guideline for response to 483s, it is a good outline for response to any crisis. 

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
This entry was posted in Crisis Communications, Useful Resources. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.