Ad from Google

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    My Profile

    • EXPERTISE -
      Authority on regulatory aspects of communications and medical products, with particular emphasis on pre-approval communications; strategist to help pharma and biotech companies prepare best case for advisory committee approval; issues and crisis management. Frequent speaker on various aspects of same - drug development, promotion, reimbursement and new media in a highly regulated environment. Author of books, newspaper and magazine pieces related to drug marketing and promotion as well as HIV specialty pieces. And of course... blogger!

    About This Blog

    • Eye on FDA is published by Mark Senak of Fleishman-Hillard's Washington, D.C. office. The thoughts and ideas in this blog and postings are strictly my own and are not screened by my employer. Everything posted on this blog is my personal opinion and does not necessarily represent the views of Fleishman-Hillard or its clients.

    My Favorite Dogs

    • January20063_005
      Nick and Nora

    Stats

    • eXTReMe Tracker

    Eye on FDA edrugsearch blog ranking

    • Healthcare 100

    Syndication

    « British Medical Journal Expands Digital Footprint with New YouTube Channel | Main | Complete Response Letter Review for December 2008 »

    January 06, 2009

    A Conversation with the FDA About the Nature of REMS


     FDA Logo In 2007, the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA) was signed into law by President Bush.  The legislation contained a great deal of reform of FDA regulation over the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, one element of which was to allow the FDA to require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) where a Risk Minimization Action Plan(RiskMAP)had once been deferrable, in effect giving the FDA the authority to demand a risk strategy. 

    Any large-scale policy transition normally carries with it confusion.  How is a REMS program different from a RiskMAP?  The FDAAA references MedGuides as an example of a REMS element, a tool that was common with RiskMAPs.  How is REMS different from RiskMAPs?

    The lack of widespread understanding about the nature of REMS seems apparent among companies given the number of Complete Response Letters that have been issued based on the lack of a REMS program. 

    It therefore seemed like a good idea to get some clarification in the form of a podcast to a few key questions.  I sat down yesterday with two key FDA officials - Jane Axelrad, J.D., Associate Director for Policy for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Dr. John Jenkins, Director of the Office of New Drugs. 

    We first explored what is different with REMS from RiskMAPs and we discussed the evaluative aspects of REMS, which is essentially two-fold.  On the one hand, the FDA has to evaluate the candidate compound to determine whether or not risk mitigation actions are a key part to approval and on the other, the sponsoring company must have a component of its program to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions.  We also discussed the matter of timing - when should companies begin planning REMS and working with the FDA to address risk issues.  We closed with a discussion about creative approaches to REMS programs, including digital resources.

    I want to again thank Dr. Jenkins and Ms. Axelrad for the time they took with me and for the opportunity to share their outlooks. 

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bf5969e2010536ac4366970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Conversation with the FDA About the Nature of REMS:

    Comments

    podcast not visible

    yes, i can see it. there may be a problem with the browser you are using and you might try another.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment

    Ad from Google

    Subscribe / Email Me

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Search

    • Google

      WWW
      eyeonfda.com

    July 2009

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 31